Received: from comoro.yorku.ca by mail2.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id GAA26454; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 06:21:42 -0800
From: ZHUNT@Calumet.Yorku.Ca
Received: from CALUMET.YORKU.CA (asimov.calumet.yorku.ca [130.63.231.100]) by comoro.yorku.ca (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA87952 for <lightwave-l@netcom.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 09:22:35 -0500
Received: from ASIMOV-CALUMET/MERCURYMAIL by CALUMET.YORKU.CA (Mercury 1.13);
Mon, 30 Jan 95 9:22:39 -500
Received: from MERCURYMAIL by ASIMOV-CALUMET (Mercury 1.13); Mon, 30 Jan 95 9:22:18 -500
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Organization: Calumet College, York University
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 9:23:16 -500
Subject: Re: Too Hot color LW SA
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail/Mac v2.0.5
Message-ID: <18AF3D52F0F@CALUMET.YORKU.CA>
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
>To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
>Reply-to: CRSO.LightWave@canrem.com
>Subject: Re: Too Hot color LW SA
>From: nicolai.grut@canrem.com (Nicolai Grut)
>Date: Sat, 28 Jan 1995 21:28:00 -0500
>Organization: CRS Online (Toronto, Ontario)
>
>
> I know someone else mentioned my next point and the answer was : "
> they shouldn't have to" but If an editor calls me and tells me that
> the colours are too hot or are bleeding and I think I have taken
> every precaution to avoid that, why can't they lower the chroma
> level on their TBC? The only answer I have gotten is that it would
> change the colour of the logo, which I would think would be the
> same if I lowered the saturation before I render.
>
> -Nicolai
>
> P.S: The comment I hear most after clients/producers view my
> preview tapes: "that's great but let's make the red even brighter
> and more vibrant"
>What about running the images through ADPro's NTSC-correction operator?
Would that take too much time, or does it not work well?